It seems Uli is for the Artistic now?
Uli, is that correct?
At 2:16 PM +0200 on 7/15/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
> I don't like it. It would again mean we'd have to decide who "us" is. Is
>it the mailing list? Then we'd get list tourism. Is it the core group as it
>exists now? That would be an unfair elite and would be a disadvantage to
>contributors which later join development. Is it the people who have
>contributed to OC? What is a contribution? Fixing a bug? Writing a new
>component / rewriting one? I think we should allow everyone to distribute
>OpenCard, but no one should be allowed to sell the OC sources, only
>value-added services (pressing on CD, support, ...).
>
> We should limit use of the name to the list, though, that is, democratic
>decision on the list decides what is added to the "official" OpenCard, and
>nbobody may distribute modified OpenCard sources under the official name.
>
>Cheers,
>-- M. Uli Kusterer
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.weblayout.com/witness
> 'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
>
>--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
>Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
>Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
