At 2:21 PM +1100 on 7/20/99, spierings wrote: >> So long as we are off on a plugin thread, has anyone ever considered an >>xTalk >> plugin for Codewarrior? Really, it could simply be a preprocessor plugin >>that >> converted xTalk to C (although that could get mighty ugly I'm sure). But, >> well, anyone think there is anything there? >> >> Brian > >Brian, count me in for helping to write a preprocessor for CodeWarrior and >working on an xTalk egcs. I think a preprocessor for CodeWarrior is by far the >easiest to implement. Sorry for not being an active list member of late. This >license stuff does not interest me. Probably the easiest, but probably also the most problematic. Consider error message handling. Many would appear deep within generated C code and would be generated by the C compiler.
- OODL: Goofball OT question Geoff Canyon
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Geoff Canyon
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Rob Cozens
