At 1:45 PM +0200 on 7/16/99, Uli Kusterer wrote: >>has anyone ever considered an xTalk >> plugin for Codewarrior? Really, it could simply be a preprocessor plugin >that >> converted xTalk to C (although that could get mighty ugly I'm sure). >But, >> well, anyone think there is anything there? > >Brian, > > in the Interpreter sources, there's some code Anthony wrote to do a >Just-In-Time compiler. It was too slow, but maybe it can be modified to become >useful as a CodeWarrior compiler. Of course, this would be much less useful, >as self-modifying code wouldn't be possible as easily as with HC and the >object model wouldn't be present. Theoretically it's present, but I think >that's >something for OpenCard 3 or so, not for the first release. I think what he's after is something like CompileIt, which, using OTVar.h should not be too hard.
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Geoff Canyon
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
