Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question

[DeRobertis]

At 3:08 PM +0200 on 7/17/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>I think what he's after is something like CompileIt, which, using OTVar.h
>>should not be too hard.
>
>Yup. But couldn't he take the JIT as a starting point? After all, it does
>compile to machine-language, doesn't it?

The JITC compiles to a machine language that can not be saved to disk. And
it's slow, and does not support the new features in Intepreter.

I would suggest starting with egcs. You get an optimizer and a real
compiler to start with.