Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models

[DeRobertis]

At 6:38 PM -0800 on 11/1/99, Michael Fair wrote:

>There are other advantages to this as well in terms
>of future expansion.  Because we'd be using the gcc
>bytecodes our stacks could be natively compiled on
>that platform with no interpreter needed.  The "do"
>command is a bit tricky, but not unsolvable.

I imagine we'd have to make it do a callback to the interpreter. Could get
messy, but should be doable.