At 2:43 PM +0100 on 11/7/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: > BTW -- did you check out the new XBlockFile? I'm still waiting for someone >to find my mistakes ??? I took a quick glance at it -- have not really tested it yet. But it does have serious problems when you try to run the large 20,000 block test once, then run it again. Took ~2 ticks/block. Had to nap on it :( Also, I'm not going to use gcc codes -- don't worry. Maybe later I'd build a gcc frontend -- but much later.
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Scott Raney
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes ... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... Michael Fair
- Re: Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
