At 1:40 AM +0100 on 11/8/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: >>I took a quick glance at it -- have not really tested it yet. But it does >>have serious problems when you try to run the large 20,000 block test once, >>then run it again. Took ~2 ticks/block. Had to nap on it :( > >Anthony, > > that's strange. On my slow Mac it always takes 0 (zero) ticks per block, >which means it's always below 1 tick... hmmmm... back to the drawing board. Hmmm... Are you testing the _second_ time of writing a lot of blocks? That is, do it once, then immediatly do it again? [I'll get to do more formal tests and examinations starting tomorrow -- nice long weekend]. > > Did you try compiling it using MPW? Is that what the test came from, or >will it get faster using MPW? I have not recompiled it. Not sure how MPW will effect the timings.
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Scott Raney
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes ... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... Michael Fair
- Re: Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
