At 2:10 PM +0100 on 11/2/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: >Folks, > > gcc bytecode is nice for compilers, but I doubt it's appropriate for >OpenCard. You wouldn't want to have to compile your stack every time you >change a script. Well, with the current Interpreter you do have to compile the relevant script every time you change it, and you do want to do that. It's a lot faster.
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Scott Raney
- OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as m... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes ... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and byteco... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes ... Michael Fair
- Re: Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Java VM and bytecodes as models Michael Fair
