>Why don't we use wxWindows which already has >a cross platform implementation? > >It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a >license which is essentially LGPL. > >http://www.wxwindows.org/ Michael, I think we already had it under consideration ... I think back then we downed it because it's so large and generic? When I compiled an application it was minimum 400k. Plus any code we write this could easily grow past the 1MB border. I wouldn't mind re-considering it, though. Cheers, -- M. Uli Kusterer ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.weblayout.com/witness 'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...' --- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: --- Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC a . spierings
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Julian Blackhirst
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
