At 8:41 AM +0000 on 12/24/99, Michael Fair wrote: >Why don't we use wxWindows which already has >a cross platform implementation? > >It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a >license which is essentially LGPL. > >http://www.wxwindows.org/ We've discussed it before. I think we might be able to defeat the LGPL's problems by allowing the user to re-link the object, exactly as they say, by using a shared lib.
- OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC a . spierings
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Julian Blackhirst
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
