> >Why don't we use wxWindows which already has > >a cross platform implementation? > > > >It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a > >license which is essentially LGPL. > > > >http://www.wxwindows.org/ > > Michael, > > I think we already had it under consideration ... I think back then we > downed it because it's so large and generic? When I compiled an application > it was minimum 400k. Plus any code we write this could easily grow past the > 1MB border. I wouldn't mind re-considering it, though. last beta was released in 4th july 99. mac version may be dead. andre
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC a . spierings
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Julian Blackhirst
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC Jean-Marie . Lafon
- Re: OODL: Button under Visual C++/MFC M. Uli Kusterer
