Uli:
>k for
>the partnership it is important, as each one is liable to the other. We
>can't have 90% of the group decide over 10% of it. It's to dangerous. Every
>*partner* needs the right to veto.

Anthony:
>IMO, this does not mean that every piece of code checked in most recieve
>unanimous consent, but rather that agreeing on the person(s) to decide on
>and check in that code does. And there is nothing wrong with that. [Uli
>agrees]

I just don't see how you can reconcile the two statements:  either every
partner has a veto on everything or some actions can be taken even if a
partner objects...which is it?

Rob Cozens, CCW
http://www.serendipitysoftware.com/who.html

"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."

from "The Triple Foole" by  John Donne (1572-1631)

Reply via email to