>THIS IS A GOOD THING! Remember, we're all liable for everyone else's
>actions in the partnership, and I, for one, will not be a part of ANY suhc
>agreement where I can have a decision I do not consent to forced upon me.
>
>IMO, this does not mean that every piece of code checked in most recieve
>unanimous consent, but rather that agreeing on the person(s) to decide on
>and check in that code does. And there is nothing wrong with that.
This is how I understood it, too. Eric will confirm this when he's back.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first draft DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first dr... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first dr... Garry
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - firs... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - ... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreeme... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreeme... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agr... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - ... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first dr... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first draft Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first draft Mark Rauterkus
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first draft Paul Sutton
- Re: OODL: Eric's Partnership agreement - first draft Paul Sutton
