Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020 06:20:01 UTC schrieb Nil: > > > The existing deduction rules > > > https://github.com/opencog/pln/blob/master/opencog/pln/rules/term/deduction.scm > > > are only defined for implication and inheritance links, so if you were > to use them you'd have to formulate the semantics of `linked` in these > terms. Let know if you want more guidance on that. That is said writing > your own rules is a perfectly fine way to go and in fact better if you > wish to have full control over the inference process. > > Yes, I defined my own deduction rule to do that, help would be greatly appreciated, there are a few other things I'm still struggling with, but let's focus on the current predicament first.
> The truth value (stv 1 0) however doesn't seem right. > Yes, it should be above zero strength even for GetLink results, right? Is there a way to avoid adding the query to the atomspace in python? > So something unintended seems to be happening. Can you point me to the > full script of your experiment? > I boiled the test code down a bit to make it easier to parse. You can find it here <https://gist.github.com/alexander-gabriel/8e4593e76120752cbccb9a5c73cec691> . The whole project is somewhat more involved, but I can point you to that as well, if you're interested. Thank you so much :) Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/c43e51ac-69d1-4b54-a14b-3b0e176eec5b%40googlegroups.com.
