Hi Alex,
On 1/10/20 12:59 PM, Alexander Gabriel wrote:
I boiled the test code down a bit to make it easier to parse. You can
find it here
<https://gist.github.com/alexander-gabriel/8e4593e76120752cbccb9a5c73cec691>.
1. I've never used the Python binding, but I would think/hope that you
don't need to invoke scheme to configure it. Can someone comment on
that?
2. You don't need `GetLink` in the query, and the variable declaration
can be given as optional argument (I don't know the syntax in
Python).
That makes me think, maybe we should consider introducing a
BackwardChainerGetLink
or such, and run that instead of calling a specialized BackwardChainer
function. What do you guys (including Alex) think?
Nil
The whole project is somewhat more involved, but I can point you to that
as well, if you're interested.
Thank you so much :)
Alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/c43e51ac-69d1-4b54-a14b-3b0e176eec5b%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/c43e51ac-69d1-4b54-a14b-3b0e176eec5b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/da1abf45-cfd3-582f-146c-a79ef25301e5%40gmail.com.
