On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 12:30 +0200, Thilo Schuler wrote: > I can understand Josinas comments about clinicians not caring about > the difference between semantics and GUI stuff, so a tool like the > Template Designer should hide this important separation, where > appropriate.
Not withstanding your 'where appropriate' caveat. The clinicians creating templates (as with archetypes) need to have training and a special understanding of what is at stake. If the clinicians designing archetypes/templates do not care about the difference between semantics and GUI stuff then they are they wrong clinicians to be designing archetypes and templates. <sarcasm> They should probably be designing another "By Physicians for Physicians EMR". Do we really need another one of those? We also do not need another EHR built by clueless IT people. </sarcasm> That's not meant to disparage the clinicians on the various openEHR mailing lists. This is a multidisciplinary issue and it takes all of us to do this the right way. Again, the 'right' people must be the ones designing the knowledge modules. My 2 pence. --Tim -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080627/976968f8/attachment.asc>