I will have a play around with some new meta-data additions to archetypes and put them on this list in the next day or so. Let's then think about what is needed in terms of different kinds of 'identifiers', both assigned and generated.
- thomas On 08/04/2011 01:40, Heath Frankel wrote: > Hi Erik, > I was suggesting that we enforce OIDs, in fact my intent was similar to > yours, to open up the choice of what is used and not enforce the specially > designed ID scheme currently used that requires upgrading to support > namespacing making it have the same issues as the standard UID schemes. > > I like the suggestion of URIs, although I also agree with Tom's later > comment that within openEHR implementations we should try to limit the > options of the URI schemes used. However, ADL and AOM shouldn't be > restricted to this same set, to allow other implementation profiles for > other reference models to make their own choices. > > Heath > * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110408/84948970/attachment.html>
