Hi Diego,

Very interesting. Is any of the documentation available without paying a
small fortune?

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical analyst, Ocean Informatics, UK
openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org



On 8 April 2011 12:20, Diego Bosc? <yampeku at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> I have been working some time in DCM/archetype metadata. Dublin Core
> is suitable for that, however, there is an ISO norm (ISO 15699. Health
> informatics. Clinical knowledge resources. Metadata ) which is an
> extension of Dublin Core for Health informatics and it's even more
> suitable. They have even defined 'archetype' as one of the valid
> document types!. I would be interested in helping on metadata topic.
> When do we start? ;)
>
>
> 2011/4/8 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se>:
> > Hi!
> >
> > While we are discussing metadata and identifiers... Shouldn't the
> > metadata/description part of an archetype/template be based on Dublin
> > Core ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core ) instead of an
> > openEHR specific approach? That might make librarians, search engines
> > and other existing artifact storage/searc software feel more at home
> > :-) Using Dublin Core does not take away the requirement of having
> > identifiers though, since something has to go into the Dublin Core
> > identifier field. There are several levels of Dublin Core and the ones
> > with good structural requirements on the values may be useful.
> >
> > The idea of using Dublin Core for archetype/template-like-artifacts I
> > got from Tim Cook et.al. in MLHIM.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Erik Sundvall
> > erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/  Tel: +46-13-286733
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57, Thomas Beale
> > <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
> >> I will have a play around with some new meta-data additions to
> archetypes
> >> and put them on this list in the next day or so. Let's then think about
> what
> >> is needed in terms of different kinds of 'identifiers', both assigned
> and
> >> generated.
> >>
> >> - thomas
> > _______________________________________________
> > openEHR-technical mailing list
> > openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110408/59018744/attachment.html>

Reply via email to