Hello I have been working some time in DCM/archetype metadata. Dublin Core is suitable for that, however, there is an ISO norm (ISO 15699. Health informatics. Clinical knowledge resources. Metadata ) which is an extension of Dublin Core for Health informatics and it's even more suitable. They have even defined 'archetype' as one of the valid document types!. I would be interested in helping on metadata topic. When do we start? ;)
2011/4/8 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se>: > Hi! > > While we are discussing metadata and identifiers... Shouldn't the > metadata/description part of an archetype/template be based on Dublin > Core ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core ) instead of an > openEHR specific approach? That might make librarians, search engines > and other existing artifact storage/searc software feel more at home > :-) Using Dublin Core does not take away the requirement of having > identifiers though, since something has to go into the Dublin Core > identifier field. There are several levels of Dublin Core and the ones > with good structural requirements on the values may be useful. > > The idea of using Dublin Core for archetype/template-like-artifacts I > got from Tim Cook et.al. in MLHIM. > > Best regards, > Erik Sundvall > erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ ?Tel: +46-13-286733 > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57, Thomas Beale > <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: >> I will have a play around with some new meta-data additions to archetypes >> and put them on this list in the next day or so. Let's then think about what >> is needed in terms of different kinds of 'identifiers', both assigned and >> generated. >> >> - thomas > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >
