On 02/09/2013 08:49, David Moner wrote: > > > > 2013/9/2 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com > <mailto:thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>> > >> >> Well, LinkEHR is a real implementation in use by several >> organizations, and we think these identifiers are needed both >> technically and methodologically, so we will continue our way of >> doing thing :-) > > To be clear, I didn't mean modelling tools, I meant production EHR > systems that use the resulting models. > > > Of course, me too: > http://www.eurorec.org/news_events/newsArchive.cfm?newsID=239
Yep, I know about that (the more systems the better!). But I would be interested to know what the clinical models look like - are they posted anywhere? And what is the clinical modelling process? I would think after a few years of it, there would be some ideas on which nodes need to be defined and which don't? I'm just trying to get some evidence here, so we can better understand the right set of rules to use in the formalism and its tooling. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130902/0d0697fa/attachment.html>
