On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm wondering how > long we > can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll get > more attention. > This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is the only C library worth thinking about. Khem took the action to talk with musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a new #define to them. I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. I'll > probably have some > cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, if the > issues are still > around. > I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an updated branch and I can merge that in too. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
