On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm wondering >> how long we >> can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll get >> more attention. >> > > This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is > the only C library worth thinking about. Khem took the action to talk with > musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a new > #define to them. > oh, and is this one logged in bugzilla ? (or elsewhere, I don't care .. i just want to have a look at the proposed fix so I can start a musl build and see if I can fix things in the background). Bruce > > I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. I'll >> probably have some >> cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, if >> the issues are still >> around. >> > > I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an updated > branch and I can merge that in too. > > Ross > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core