On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:

> On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm wondering
>> how long we
>> can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll get
>> more attention.
> This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is
> the only C library worth thinking about.  Khem took the action to talk with
> musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a new
> #define to them.

oh, and is this one logged in bugzilla ? (or elsewhere, I don't care .. i
just want to have a look
at the proposed fix so I can start a musl build and see if I can fix things
in the background).


> I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out.  I'll
>> probably have some
>> cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, if
>> the issues are still
>> around.
> I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an updated
> branch and I can merge that in too.
> Ross

"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
Openembedded-core mailing list

Reply via email to