On 1/13/17 6:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm > wondering how long we > can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll > get more attention. > > > This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is > the only C library worth thinking about. Khem took the action to talk > with musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a > new #define to them.
There is an idea to preprocess the kernel headers for musl systems, I will replicate whatever action community decides on. > > I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. > I'll probably have some > cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, > if the issues are still > around. > > > I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an > updated branch and I can merge that in too. > > Ross > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
