On 1/13/17 6:25 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> 
> On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
> <mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm
>     wondering how long we
>     can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll
>     get more attention.
> 
> 
> This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is
> the only C library worth thinking about.  Khem took the action to talk
> with musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a
> new #define to them.

There is an idea to preprocess the kernel headers for musl systems, I
will replicate whatever action community decides on.

> 
>     I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. 
>     I'll probably have some
>     cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's,
>     if the issues are still
>     around.
> 
> 
> I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an
> updated branch and I can merge that in too.
> 
> Ross
> 
> 
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to