On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On 13 January 2017 at 14:19, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm wondering >> how long we >> can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll get >> more attention. >> > > This is a greater problem - the kernel guys seem to think that glibc is > the only C library worth thinking about. Khem took the action to talk with > musl and get their headers fixed - which I believe is just adding a new > #define to them. > And gcc is the only compiler! ;) FWIW I spent 6 hours over the holidays trying to fix a musl build error, but I have no idea how its defines work, so all I did figure out is what kernel commit broke it ... to be fair, glibc is just as nuts and it the uapi headers break it, I'm just as lost. > > I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. I'll >> probably have some >> cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, if >> the issues are still >> around. >> > > I keep on pushing the kernel bits to mut2, so feel free to send an updated > branch and I can merge that in too. > ok. So I'll repost the series over the weekend with more -stable, -rt and tools tweaks. It will overlap the old one .. if that causes a problem, let me know now, and I'll try and make sure it starts where the other left off instead. Bruce > > Ross > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
