"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 We have to understand that we are a small group, and the degree of legal 
protection we want is difficult to fathom. The US and the EU provide the 
greatest threat to Open Source develpment at the moment particularly from 
software patents ad such issues. For other countries in asia and africa FOSS is 
a great path to develop freely. China, South Korea, Japan and India have taken 
up FOSS at government level. This is a lot of people getting into FOSS. There 
is also much support from smaller countries for the FOSS develpment model.
 
 The US and EU with their laws on patents and copyright maybe considered a 
threat. There are many protests against the foceful use of so called 
"international law" to crush development of ICT in these countires at crucial 
times. Copyright laws maeans having to buy software and the end to piracy. But 
this also puts the breaks on the initiatives of the governments and NGOs in 
these countries to promote ICT. The only way out seems to be FOSS.
 
 Therefore rather than worry about legalities, let those who consider Malaysian 
law inadequate state categorically what they want in the OSHCA incorporation 
and see what will be missing in Malaysia as opposed to US or elsewhere.
 
 If not let us branch out into even smaller groups, and form
 OSHCA- asia or AOSHCA or OSHCAA
 OSHCA - US
 OSHCA - africa
 
 etc. etc.
 
 
 NandA
     David Forslund wrote:
 > There may be legal protection, etc in Malaysia.
 
 Not may be, there definitely is. As Molly said, Malaysian law was
 originally based on British law - it is now distinct from it, but rest
 assured that there is rule of civil law in Malaysia. There is also
 corruption and political influence over the courts, but I would not like
 to have to say whether there is more or less such corruption in Malaysia
 than in the US or other countries. However, for a tiny, nascent
 organisation like OSHCA, none of this is relevant. Suffice to say that
 Malaysian corporate law should be more than adequate for OSHCA's
 purposes. That's correct, isn't it Molly?
 
 >  We are more familiar
 > with the situation in the US.
 
 Well, yes. I am more familiar with Australian law. But that doesn't mean
 that I regard the legal regimes in every other country with suspicion.
 
 > It is more of a question of comparing what is required and what you can
 > do with a corporation
 > in Malaysia than in the US.  The decision shouldn't be made on political
 > grounds but on technical grounds,
 > in my opinion.
 
 Given what OSHCA hopes to achieve - things like engaging with
 UN-sponsored initiatives such as WSIS and perhaps with national and
 international development agencies -  I think that incorporation in
 Malaysia (or some other "non-aligned" developing or transitional
 country) is a *much* more sound choice, from a political perspective,
 than incorporation in the US (or other G8 or other rich nations, but
 particularly the US, particularly at the moment).
 
 Tim C
 
 > Molly Cheah wrote:
 >  > I was born in Malaysia and lived through the period where we obtained
 >  > independance from the British and from whom our legal framework was
 >  > adopted. Just wondering what are the concerns of Richard and David on
 >  > the legal protection for OSHCA. Can you elaborate rather than make a
 >  > comment that imply there isn't legal protection. Incidently we don't
 >  > have the equivalence of Guantanano Bay in Malaysia.
 >  > Molly
 >  > Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
 >  >
 >  > >Legal protection in the context of an organization like OSHCA is IMHO
 >  > >not a major concern. What is more important is how the countries laws
 >  > >influence governance.
 >  > >
 >  > >David Forslund wrote:
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >>I don't understand why this is good or even relevant.  What should
 >  > >>matter is the legal protection
 >  > >>provided by the incorporation in the various countries participating,
 >  > >>which I think was Richard's point.
 >  > >>
 >  > >>Dave Forslund
 >  > >>  
 >  > >>
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >Yahoo! Groups Links
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  > >
 >  >
 >  >
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
 > 
 >     *  Visit your group "openhealth 
 > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth>"
 >       on the web.
 >        
 >     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 >        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >       <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >        
 >     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
 >       <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. 
 > 
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 
            

        SPONSORED LINKS   
                                                    Software distribution       
                                Salon software                                  
     Medical software                                                           
          Software association                                       Software 
jewelry                                       Software deployment               
                                                  
      
---------------------------------
   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
 
    
    Visit your group "openhealth" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
 
    
---------------------------------
 
 
     

                
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to