Is it possible to activate the optimizations for me in RoboVM 0.0.2 or 0.0.3 (github)?
Am 12.07.2013 um 17:11 schrieb Niklas Therning <nik...@therning.org>: > RoboVM doesn't do release builds yet (virtually none of LLVM's optimizations > are enabled) and virtual and interface method dispatch is horribly slow > (linear search on every call!!!). So there are A LOT of opportunities for > improvements. The focus so far has been to get something up and running which > can actually be used to make apps. I hope I will get the time to optimize > things later this year. > > Is this demo open source? It would be interesting to test it on iOS. > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com> wrote: > BTW, we've run a VM performance benchmark against HotSpot on PI vs. RoboVM on > iOS and for raw power RoboVM seems faster (lower time to invoke a method, > read a field, etc etc). However in the real world RoboVM is slow and I don't > know why (GC overhead maybe)? > > Richard > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > That should be encouraging, since the CPU on the PI is *way* worse than the > > CPU on an iPhone or iPad. Is the difference HotSpot vs. RoboVM? The > > graphics code being executed should be pretty much exactly the same, and I > > would expect the PowerVR to be able to handle this without any trouble. > > > > Richard > > > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote: > > > >> The performance is much better than JavaFX8 on iOS :( > >> > >> > >> Am 12.07.2013 um 15:37 schrieb August Lammersdorf, InteractiveMesh > >> <s...@interactivemesh.com>: > >> > >>> Found this on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-scxqJjTJKI > >>> > >>> August > >> > > > >
