No, it's not possible. These have not yet been implemented.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote: > Is it possible to activate the optimizations for me in RoboVM 0.0.2 or > 0.0.3 (github)? > > > Am 12.07.2013 um 17:11 schrieb Niklas Therning <nik...@therning.org>: > > RoboVM doesn't do release builds yet (virtually none of LLVM's > optimizations are enabled) and virtual and interface method dispatch is > horribly slow (linear search on every call!!!). So there are A LOT of > opportunities for improvements. The focus so far has been to get something > up and running which can actually be used to make apps. I hope I will get > the time to optimize things later this year. > > Is this demo open source? It would be interesting to test it on iOS. > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com>wrote: > >> BTW, we've run a VM performance benchmark against HotSpot on PI vs. >> RoboVM on iOS and for raw power RoboVM seems faster (lower time to invoke a >> method, read a field, etc etc). However in the real world RoboVM is slow >> and I don't know why (GC overhead maybe)? >> >> Richard >> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >> > That should be encouraging, since the CPU on the PI is *way* worse than >> the CPU on an iPhone or iPad. Is the difference HotSpot vs. RoboVM? The >> graphics code being executed should be pretty much exactly the same, and I >> would expect the PowerVR to be able to handle this without any trouble. >> > >> > Richard >> > >> > On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Tobias Bley <t...@ultramixer.com> wrote: >> > >> >> The performance is much better than JavaFX8 on iOS :( >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 12.07.2013 um 15:37 schrieb August Lammersdorf, InteractiveMesh < >> s...@interactivemesh.com>: >> >> >> >>> Found this on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-scxqJjTJKI >> >>> >> >>> August >> >> >> > >> >> > >
