On 14.11.2019 16:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 13.11.2019 19:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> On 11/13/2019 9:42 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: ... cut ... >>> To reproduce the testcase one would need ooRexx and the Java bridge >>> BSF4ooRexx (all opensource) for >>> which I could come up with a zip-archive (assuming binaries within should >>> be 64-bit) and a script to >>> set up the environment either for Windows, Linux or MacOS, whatever you >>> advise. Would that be o.k.? >> We prefer not to rely on third-party libraries for test cases. In any case >> we would not be able to >> use that for a regression test / unit test.
If test units really seem to be important in this particular case, one possibility would be to create a minimalistic ScriptEngine implementation in pure Java just for the sole purpose to allow the creation of a test unit that is able to assert that FXMLLoader puts the ScriptEngine.ARGV and ScriptEngine.FILENAME entries into the ENGINE_SCOPE Bindings. E.g. having the ScriptEngine's eval() methods return the ScriptContext at invocation time in order to allow inspection of the Bindings. This way it would become also possible to write in addition test units that also check whether all FXML elements that carry a fx:id are really placed into the GLOBAL_SCOPE Bindings. However,
