On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:22:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > I don't mind either way. If we want to proceed, I'm OK with either of: > > 1. Accept the PR as-is and file a follow-up issue > > 2. Add the change proposed by @nlisker and list him as a co-contributor > (in which case he can still review it). my preference would be 2 - would be as complete as required right now (and Nir sees it's working :). Still would need a follow-up issue to modify the .classpath of the other modules, to enable them to make use of the memory leak test. Might happen at the time they actually start using it. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/352
