On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:29:02 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg <faste...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Plus this extra effort would only fix the current usage of memorybuddy, >>> leaving future inclusions in the other modules still broken. >> >> I think that this is fine. When future uses occur they should be accompanied >> by the inclusion of the dependency, unless we know of plans to use it in >> other modules. In any case, there is no need to close this PR. > > okay, so will simply unassign the issue and leave the PR open for someone > else to complete - thanks for your input :) @kleopatra You can just add the line I gave in the .classpath file, there's no need for any setup. We can be listed as co-authors if you want. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/352
