On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 02:44:44 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Moves the filter setting of the samplers from the device parameters 
>> configuration to the use-site, allowing for dynamic changes in the sampler. 
>> This PR does internal plumbing work only to bring it close to the ES2 
>> pipeline. A followup PR will create the public API.
>> 
>> Summary of the changes:
>> * Created a new (internal for now) `TextureData` object that is intended to 
>> contain all the data of texture (map) of `PhongMaterial`, such as filters, 
>> addressing, wrapping mode, mipmaps etc. **This PR deals only with filters** 
>> as a starting point, more settings can be added later.
>> * Creates an update mechanism from the Java side material to the native D3D 
>> layer. The public API `PhoneMaterial` is *not* changed yet. The peer 
>> `NGPhongMaterial` is configured to receive update from the public 
>> `PhongMaterial` when the public API is created via new 
>> `ObjectProperty<TextureData>` properties.
>> * Small refactoring in the D3D layer with a new map types enum to control 
>> the texture settings more easily.
>> 
>> The JBS issue lists some regressions in a comment, but I couldn't reproduce 
>> them. It looks like the sampler settings needed to be added anywhere, and 
>> that was the easiest to do at the time. Now they were just moved.
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-prism-d3d/D3DPhongMaterial.h line 41:
> 
>> 39:     self_illumination,
>> 40:     num_map_types
>> 41: };
> 
> 1. Types generally seem to use PascalCase in this library, and constants 
> UPPER_CASE or CamelCase.
> 2. You can use `enum class` to prevent the constants from polluting the 
> global namespace.
> 3. The underlying type doesn't need to be specified, it's `int` by default. 
> You're casting it to `int` in `D3DMeshView.cc` anyway.

About 2, I tried that initially and got into problems iterating over the enum 
in `D3DMeshView.cc` line 293. How would you perform the iteration?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1281#discussion_r1390020946

Reply via email to