yes I am quite sure about that part of the LPGL. As soon as you modify the Sources of OpenMeetings you have to publish and license the modifications either under LGPL or GPL.
But if you use OpenMeetings by using for example the Web-Service Gateway => so you do not modify OpenMeetings => you can redistribute it as part of your application without changing your License (so you can also re-distribute it under a propriatry license ... but only if you use it *as a library*. Modifing the sources and re-publish it under non (L)GPL terms is not LGPL-conform. In case of GPL you are right => GPL code can only by re-distributed as GPL In case of LGPL => you can choose if you would like to re-distribute as LPGL or GPL. 2009/1/8 Roberto Torresani <[email protected]> > Hi Sebastian! > Are you sure about this? > > I know that if you use a code with GPL license (or LGPL) you could do all > you want, but you can't give to third part for example compile code: you > must give them the source. You are not obligate to public to the world the > modify you do. > > Make the source code public available: you can not distribute compile code > Redistribute the source only licensed as GPL or LPGL: if in a my project I > use code GPL I must distribute all the project only with GPL license (but I > must not distribute it) > > Bye > Roberto > > > 2009/1/8 Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]> > >> and the more I read about it... actually persony.com is already violating >> the LPGL. >> The do not only use OpenMeetings as Library, they modified it. In order to >> the terms of the LPGL they have to: >> - make the source code public available >> - redistribute the source code only licensed as GPL or LPGL. >> >> so in fact this IS already violation of LGPL. >> >> >> sebastian >> >> 2009/1/8 Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]> >> >>> there is no real reason for v2 or v3. I read some articles about v3 but I >>> am not sure about the real changes from v2 to v3. A BSD styled license would >>> be also an option. >>> >>> >>> >>> sebastian >>> >>> 2009/1/8 Alan Bell <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>>> why not GPL3? >>>> >>>> just curious. >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> Sebastian Wagner wrote: >>>> > hi, >>>> > >>>> > I am thinking of releasing the next package under GPLv2 >>>> > GPLv2 forces anybody who re-uses the package to release all of its >>>> > content also under the GPL. >>>> > >>>> > The reason is for that is I find commercial product like for example >>>> > persony.com <http://persony.com> are using parts of OpenMeetings >>>> > (screen-sharing client) but they never contributed anything back to >>>> > the plattform. >>>> > >>>> > sebastian >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Sebastian Wagner >>>> > http://www.webbase-design.de >>>> > http://openmeetings.googlecode.com >>>> > http://www.laszlo-forum.de >>>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sebastian Wagner >>> http://www.webbase-design.de >>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com >>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com >> http://www.laszlo-forum.de >> [email protected] >> >> >> > > > > -- Sebastian Wagner http://www.webbase-design.de http://openmeetings.googlecode.com http://www.laszlo-forum.de [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenMeetings developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
