ethical code should be returned to the author, the fact is that the license
does not provide this


2009/1/8 Kunthar <[email protected]>

>
> Ethically, every commercial user of the OM should return the code that
> they developed.
>
> I suggest to create a "Who Uses Open Meeting" page
>
> Something like this;
> --------------------------- SNIP ------------------------------------------
> == Please add yourself to the list, if you use Open Meetings with any
> purpose. ==
>
> We would like to see who uses Open Meetings and for what purposes really.
>  * Please give your project name,
>  * Please add URL could be reacahable if any exist,
>  * Please do not forget to join our mailing lists and help to
> developers. Return all code you developed. This is GPL based software.
> Violation of this license is will be a reason of sue!
> --------------------------- SNIP ------------------------------------------
>
>
> Also Sebastian has rights to sue anyone willing to do this!
> We can trace and find one by one, all those cheeters and betray them too.
> Existing global corporation laws helps to follow any kind of behaviour
> like this. This is not a dream any more that possibly sue some one
> live in different country other then yours. We have time and resources
> as well, to do this.
> Personally; I hate those minds. Sorry for this.
>
> Peace
> Kunth
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > *However, putting the program on a server machine for the public to talk
> to
> > is hardly "private" use, so it would be legitimate to require release of
> the
> > source code in that special case*
> > => this is definitely not just a showcase of an application.
> >
> > however, this does not really met the situation.
> > persony not only *publish* something on their website. They basically
> sell
> > their product for resellers. So they really sell the hole server not only
> > the *service* on their demo server. You can download and install on your
> own
> > or for example or join their Partner program ...
> > http://www.persony.com/partners_program.php *Reseller Partners*
> >
> > so this is not about a *Conferencing Webside* where they run a single /
> > multiple instances of the application they basically sell the hole
> software.
> >
> > sebastian
> >
> >
> > 2009/1/8 Roberto Torresani <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#UnreleasedMods
> >>
> >>
> >> 2009/1/8 Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> yes I am quite sure about that part of the LPGL.
> >>> As soon as you modify the Sources of OpenMeetings you have to publish
> and
> >>> license the modifications either under LGPL or GPL.
> >>>
> >>> But if you use OpenMeetings by using for example the Web-Service
> Gateway
> >>> => so you do not modify OpenMeetings => you can redistribute it as part
> of
> >>> your application without changing your License (so you can also
> >>> re-distribute it under a propriatry license ... but only if you use it
> *as a
> >>> library*.
> >>>
> >>> Modifing the sources and re-publish it under non (L)GPL terms is not
> >>> LGPL-conform.
> >>>
> >>> In case of GPL you are right => GPL code can only by re-distributed as
> >>> GPL
> >>> In case of LGPL => you can choose if you would like to re-distribute as
> >>> LPGL or GPL.
> >>>
> >>> 2009/1/8 Roberto Torresani <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Sebastian!
> >>>> Are you sure about this?
> >>>>
> >>>> I know that if you use a code with GPL license (or LGPL) you could do
> >>>> all you want, but you can't give to third part for example compile
> code: you
> >>>> must give them the source. You are not obligate to public to the world
> the
> >>>> modify you do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Make the source code public available: you can not distribute compile
> >>>> code
> >>>> Redistribute the source only licensed as GPL or LPGL: if in a my
> project
> >>>> I use code GPL I must distribute all the project only with GPL license
>  (but
> >>>> I must not distribute it)
> >>>>
> >>>> Bye
> >>>> Roberto
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2009/1/8 Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and the more I read about it... actually persony.com is already
> >>>>> violating the LPGL.
> >>>>> The do not only use OpenMeetings as Library, they modified it. In
> order
> >>>>> to the terms of the LPGL they have to:
> >>>>> - make the source code public available
> >>>>> - redistribute the source code only licensed as GPL or LPGL.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> so in fact this IS already violation of LGPL.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sebastian
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2009/1/8 Sebastian Wagner <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> there is no real reason for v2 or v3. I read some articles about v3
> >>>>>> but I am not sure about the real changes from v2 to v3. A BSD styled
> license
> >>>>>> would be also an option.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sebastian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2009/1/8 Alan Bell <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> why not GPL3?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> just curious.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner wrote:
> >>>>>>> > hi,
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > I am thinking of releasing the next package under GPLv2
> >>>>>>> > GPLv2 forces anybody who re-uses the package to release all of
> its
> >>>>>>> > content also under the GPL.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > The reason is for that is I find commercial product like for
> >>>>>>> > example
> >>>>>>> > persony.com <http://persony.com> are using parts of OpenMeetings
> >>>>>>> > (screen-sharing client) but they never contributed anything back
> to
> >>>>>>> > the plattform.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > sebastian
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > --
> >>>>>>> > Sebastian Wagner
> >>>>>>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> >>>>>>> > http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> >>>>>>> > http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> >>>>>>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
> >>>>>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> >>>>>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Sebastian Wagner
> >>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
> >>>>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> >>>>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sebastian Wagner
> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de
> >>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> >>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> > http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> > [email protected]
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenMeetings developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to