On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Vit Mares <[email protected]> wrote: > I also vote for Freddie, he is the sureness where everybody finds > usable binary release for Windows. > It is very important for embedded developers (not only for beginners) > to have the possibility of using running version instead of the only > you-can-build-it-though-but-first-install-Cygwin-then-find-etc. > I would bet that most of OpenOCD users are working on Windows > and belaud to the skies this wonderful tool.
I agree. > The sing would be even louder if they have binary Windows release > with FTD2XX.dll support :-) That has been shot down because of potential GPL licensing issues. I think we all have to respect that decision. BTW, based on my tests a whole ago, FTD2xx does not actually offer any significant speed advantages compare to libftdi/libusb-win32 for openocd under Windows. So you may want to try out libftdi build. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.openocd.devel/17877 I was hoping to see some counter-examples from others to show that D2xx is really much faster in some cases but nobody has yet to come out with the examples. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
