On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Manuel Borchers <[email protected]> wrote: > The point he was trying to make is, that one _may_ need (or want to > stick to) the "native" FTDI drivers. This may be because one wants to > use the other channel as a normal UART (speak use the virtual com port) > or some other closed source tools or there may even be no possibility to > install libftdi drivers to the machines (due to firm policies) and one > _must_ stick to the FTDI drivers.
Hello Manuel :-) This policy looks like "must install Adobe Flash Player to view this image or table", but on some systems there is no flash player (nor libftd2xx) and so this is why we should stick to the open-source and promote open-source where possible. People don't even know that open-source alternative exist, or that some proprietary solutions only work on selected platforms, this is why we should change such ignorant policies where possible :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
