hi

is there a good reason we require the latest versions of automake/ 
libpri? are we doing things that are impossible with the older ones  
used in most distros?

I'm afraid we are excluding quite a bit of the potential userbase  
with this

roy

On 5. des. 2005, at 01.51, David Burgess wrote:

> Thanks for the link I missed it.
> However,
> I am running a yum updated FC3 and
>
> The installation process failed (naturally) due to the automake/ 
> libtool
> requirements.
>
> Back to ast for me.
>
> Good luck with the project guys.
>
> Goodbye.
>
> On 12/5/05, Rico -mc- Gloeckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:06:29AM +1100, David Burgess wrote:
>>> The wiki getting started page
>>>
>>> has
>>> # Run the autoconfiguration
>>> ./configure --prefix=$INSTALL_DIR
>>>
>>> However, ./configure does not exist in the current trunk download.
>>> What have I missed.
>>
>> The second link within the body of this page (that reads 'OpenPBX.org
>> Reference').
>>
>> --
>> http://www.ukeer.de/about.html
>>
>> "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was
>>  rejected without, I thought, proper consideration."
>> --Stan Kelly-Bootle
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openpbx-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

Reply via email to