On 07/12/05, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi
is there a good reason we require the latest versions of automake/
libpri? are we doing things that are impossible with the older ones
used in most distros?
I'm afraid we are excluding quite a bit of the potential userbase
with this
roy
On 5. des. 2005, at 01.51, David Burgess wrote:
> Thanks for the link I missed it.
> However,
> I am running a yum updated FC3 and
>
> The installation process failed (naturally) due to the automake/
> libtool
> requirements.
>
> Back to ast for me.
>
> Good luck with the project guys.
>
> Goodbye.
>
> On 12/5/05, Rico -mc- Gloeckner < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:06:29AM +1100, David Burgess wrote:
>>> The wiki getting started page
>>>
>>> has
>>> # Run the autoconfiguration
>>> ./configure --prefix=$INSTALL_DIR
>>>
>>> However, ./configure does not exist in the current trunk download.
>>> What have I missed.
>>
>> The second link within the body of this page (that reads ' OpenPBX.org
>> Reference').
>>
>> --
>> http://www.ukeer.de/about.html
>>
>> "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was
>> rejected without, I thought, proper consideration."
>> --Stan Kelly-Bootle
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openpbx-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
--
Michal Bielicki
Halo Kwadrat Sp. z o.o.
http://www.asterisk.pl/
http://www.openpbx.org/
_______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
