To all the developers of OpenSA,
I can't speak for everyone, but I feel that many ppl are looking at OpenSA
as a viable alternative for the following reasons:
1) Plain tired of the path M$ is heading.
Bugs, licensing, open-standards, security, etc.
2) Don't come from a strong development background.
The last time I coded C++ was on MS-DOS 6.21
and it was just a console app (!)
3) Don't know or trust themselves enough to use unix/linux.
If I knew just enough to be able to at least know what to look
for when something goes wrong, NT would be headed to /dev/nul
4) Configuring SSL
Enough said =)
Time/interest permitting of course, have you ever thought about charging
to have features added, or to puch up one particular feature over another?
Still make the binary and source available for free under GPL,
but let ppl have some say on it's development.
You could charge: recognition, a postcard, pizza, SW, HW, or cash.
Of course, having fun with it would be top priority, even over cash!
Just a thought,
Jim...
