> > 2.) mod_perl:
> Because of the close ties between mod_perl and perl, the two
> really have to be distributed together, either as a seperate install
> package or in with OpenSA (ouch!)...
I would prepare the base package for perl and build a seperate
Installation for those who want mod_perl, otherwise the download
would possibly be to large.
> OpenSSL is infinitely more stable and complete than those old ssleay
> binaries I used to use, and I've not found any problems yet
> (other than some
And it will be more stable with the next release, as i plan to
integrate the 0.9.5a bug-fixes, which solve some Win32 probs.
> From a certificate issuer point of view, I'd like to see the
> ca-fix program.
The ca-fix program is not needed with OpenSSL 0.9.5 anymore, as it was
intended to fix some x509v3 extensions, but these can now be added
with the ca, x509, etc. commands.
> > To make my point clear: i never wanted any kind of financial
> > support. If you have any suggestions on how to handle things
> > in a fair way, i`d be glad to hear them.
>
> IMHO keep it all free, but say that any contributions would
> a) be welcome
> and b) bring the matter in question towards the front of your
> todo list!
Well, than let`s have it this way: who wants to contribute anything,
no matter if its pizza or cash or code, is welcome, but:
nothing is required for support. If anyone has a site running with
OpenSA: send the link to me. I`ll be glad to see it running.
Well, thats for today. One last VERY IMPORTANT NOTE:
====================================================
As the T1 connection will be switched over to a new location
within the next three days, the OpenSA server will be down for
some hours. As i have no exact date, the only thing i can definitly
say is: at saturday all will be done.
Daniel S. Reichenbach (from Work)
______________________________________________________________________
Institut Ingenium: e-Marketing. Wir beraten, konzipieren, realisieren.
http://www.ingenium.de/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
