Allen Bierbaum wrote: > Marcus Lindblom wrote: > >> Comment on the declspecs: >> >> Looking at that it seems as if OSG_BUILD_DLL should be defined for when >> building applications as well, since they need the 'dllimport' to be >> able to link to opensg-dlls. (unless, opensg is built to static libs and >> you link your application to them, creating one exe and no dlls, then it >> looks ok, but I suspect you are linking to the stub-libs for the dlls as >> usual?) >> >> >> > Yes, we don't even build static libraries in the new build. > > Should we be building static libraries? Does anyone use static libs for > OpenSG? Given the size of OpenSG, I don't think it makes any sense at all at the moment. :)
/Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
