Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi All, > >Gerrit Voss wrote: > > >>yes the OSG_BUILD_DLL must allways be set when working with dll's. Again >>this is one of the prehistoric things where we tried to build both >>static + dynamic libs. At one point in time we stop using static libs >>but never cleaned it up. >> >>Maybe we should take out the BUILD part or replace it by something more >>useful. Or we remove it completely, which might be the best thing to do >>anyway. >> >> > >Agreed. Given the complication of getting all the statically initialized >components (which includes pretty much everything) right, I'd say get >rid of static lib remnants. > > Dirk > > For now the static remnants are gone. If we need to add them back I would suggest adding a compile option like OSG_COMPILE_STATIC or something like that and leave the dynamic libraries as the default case.
-Allen > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >Opensg-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
