Gerrit Voss wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:49 +0200, Marcus Lindblom wrote: > >> Allen Bierbaum wrote: >> >>> Marcus Lindblom wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Comment on the declspecs: >>>> >>>> Looking at that it seems as if OSG_BUILD_DLL should be defined for when >>>> building applications as well, since they need the 'dllimport' to be >>>> able to link to opensg-dlls. (unless, opensg is built to static libs and >>>> you link your application to them, creating one exe and no dlls, then it >>>> looks ok, but I suspect you are linking to the stub-libs for the dlls as >>>> usual?) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, we don't even build static libraries in the new build. >>> >>> Should we be building static libraries? Does anyone use static libs for >>> OpenSG? >>> >> Given the size of OpenSG, I don't think it makes any sense at all at the >> moment. :) >> > > and together with the factory pattern it is quite tricky to get it > working in every single case. > Yeah, you'd have to use nifty-counters everywhere to make sure all code is referenced, but that's not really difficult to add, just time-consuming. :)
Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
