Hi, On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:49 +0200, Marcus Lindblom wrote: > Allen Bierbaum wrote: > > Marcus Lindblom wrote: > > > >> Comment on the declspecs: > >> > >> Looking at that it seems as if OSG_BUILD_DLL should be defined for when > >> building applications as well, since they need the 'dllimport' to be > >> able to link to opensg-dlls. (unless, opensg is built to static libs and > >> you link your application to them, creating one exe and no dlls, then it > >> looks ok, but I suspect you are linking to the stub-libs for the dlls as > >> usual?) > >> > >> > >> > > Yes, we don't even build static libraries in the new build. > > > > Should we be building static libraries? Does anyone use static libs for > > OpenSG? > Given the size of OpenSG, I don't think it makes any sense at all at the > moment. :)
and together with the factory pattern it is quite tricky to get it working in every single case. regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
