Besides....wasn't backwards compatibility a problem?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Melanie <[email protected]> wrote: > Because even if badness exists, that is not a reason to add more > badness. Let's do future additions the right way. > > Melanie > > On 31/03/2014 18:52, Oren Hurvitz wrote: > > If you say that the intention was to use REST then of course I accept > what > > you say. But whatever the vision was, the implementation today is very > > different: many services use RPC. The "/auth" endpoint, for example, > handles > > 6 methods. The "/avatar" endpoint handles 5 methods. And that's just for > > services that start with the letter 'A'. So why the pushback on the > assets > > endpoint, when so many other services already work this way? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://opensim-dev.2196679.n2.nabble.com/Optimize-pushing-assets-to-other-grids-tp7579093p7579112.html > > Sent from the opensim-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensim-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev > -- No essence. No permanence. No perfection. Only action.
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
