Torrey McMahon <Torrey.McMahon at Sun.COM> wrote: > > Well, I do not have such a CD and if I would even like to implement the > > festure > > in cdda2wav I would first need to create such a CD using cdrecord. > > > > The main ussue is that it seems that only because cdrdao is harder to use > > than > > cdrecord (because it exposes a cryptic interface to the user while cdrecord > > hides this from it's users and just makes things work) it seems that people > > pelieve that cdrdao gives more functionality but this is definitely not > > true. > > First, here's a list of CD's that have pregap info. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregap
As usual, wikipedia contains wrong information :-( > Second, I'm confused with your logic, Does cdrecord allow you to do the > two things in the text above? If not then you can't say that cdrdao > doesn't provide more functionality. Well, the problem is that you seem to mix terms. I recommencd you to start reading the manual pages for cdrtools at: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/man/cdrecord/cdrecord.1.html http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/man/cdrecord/cdda2wav.1.html to understand that the pregap support is easier and better to use in cdrtools and that it is more complete except for the ability to _extract_ data from the pregap in track 0. J?rg -- EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
