"Eric Enright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Normally I avoid derailed threads such as this, but Shawn has a good
> point. If Debian is rejecting the CDDL, then I think this is
> something that should be made aware to the community. I follow
> several high traffic osol lists, and this is the first I have heard
> about this issue.
This may be caused by the fact that Debian is not acting open when
dealing with the CDDL. They started a campaign with placing entries into
the Debian Bug Tracking System and do not mark them "resolved" although
it is obvious that nobody is able to give a substantial proof for the claim.
As long as I (partially together with Erast) remain the only person who
tries to respond to these claims, Debian will be really successful with this
kind of CDDL treatement.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
