> Shawn Walker wrote: > > > > > Alan said he *only* cared about acceptance, not the > license. Whether > > this means not anything else as well is not clear. > I'm just saying > > that I find that particular terminology in any > context unsettling. > > Acceptance should almost never be more important to > me personally. > > > Acceptance *of the license* and quite frankly, I > agree with him. In the > context of a license, success is impossible without > acceptance. > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] >
Ah, but accepted by *whom*? It's obviously already accepted. The question is by how many and are those people important? Sorry, but at this point, there is absolutely no proof that a chance in license will bring this mysterious success you propose that it will. Look at GNU Hurd. I don't see people flocking to it just because it's GPL... -Shawn This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
