On Dec 2, 2007 12:20 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2007 7:03 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <lalalalallaa> > > Is Sun even sure it's self what will do what and what will replace what? I > just get an email from somebody of this list saying Indiana will replace > SXCE and will be the basis for Solaris 11. Which is ff-ing funny since > people who work at Sun (and highly placed functions) assured me less than > four weeks ago that SXCE would stay around, that they needed the community > to do what they are doing now and how they cant do things with out them and > that SXCE would be the basis for Solaris 11 and Indiana was merrely a > product derived from SXCE.
It is true according to other high ranking folks at Sun. The plan is to eventually phase out SXCE and replace it with Indiana according to them. This was discussed at the OpenSolaris Developer's Summit. > If Indiana is going to substitute SXCE, then I'd be very very bitter, so to > say. Not only cause it'd mean heaps of people working on SXCE who worked > their ass of to make a stable product with features we should all cheer > about have been being used to make a Linux-like distro but also (from what I > can read on fora and IRC0 what they stand for is totally voided by this > decision. Again, if it's true that Indiana will replace SXCE. You are aware that a large number of individuals work on Indiana some of those whom used to work on SXCE, so how is Indiana a betlittlement of any of that work? -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
