Most code is open, most working procedures are open (lists, mercurial gates and so on).
Let's contribute. Thanks. One cannot eat the cake and continue to have it at the same time. I use ZFS on 2 external 1TB disks since 1 attached them to my x64 Laptop in January. Hint: Disable power-management for all hdd's. Over time it kills the disks plus is quite unreliable on resume with usb storage. With pm disabled for the disks you shouldn't expect many problems (and if it is enable, you have those problems also with ufs's logging, not exclusively with ZFS [in case you manually set up a ufs]). p.s. If you really want to save on your power bill, I recommend you what I did: Replace all desktops and servers with Laptops (or Niagara), with external kbd/mice/lcd's. Now my bill is down to just 1/5th of what it had been during my 2 x Blade 2000 times (which I now only power on for builds, for a limited time). And since VirtualBox is such a capable virtualizer (with many emulated components), you can even use it as AI server for 0906 x86 and sparc AI clients, if you disable NAT and instead configure it for bridging. And all that on the small footprint and high efficiency of cheap commodity x64 Laptops. I love it. Cheers, %martin On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Uwe Dippel <[email protected]> wrote: > [i]Thankfully, no one is working on an Ubuntu clone at Sun. The goal of > the OpenSolaris 200x releases, as I see it, are to create a modern OS > distribution that innovates using OpenSolaris technologies such as > DTrace, ZFS, and more.[/i] > > Yes. For the last 2.5 years I was hoping so much that OpenSolaris could come > flying off. I have a double-boot install, and always preferred the > OpenSolaris partition. It simply is - IMHO - more polished and more elegant. > I have put up with a bunch of shortcomings therefore, even invested in RAM > (rather cheap, but still, Ubuntu runs easily from 1 GB, nevermind). I didn't > mind to lose installs and having to redo them, finally Nevada is a moving > target. > I put up with sendmail losing mail, despite of most qualified help in here > (search the archives if in doubt), I have tried my best to connect to my > access point through wire and WiFi using nwam - and given up despite of a lot > of very qualified help in here (search the archives if in doubt), I have > given up to have my single WiFi-dongle coming up as rum0 (this is a minor > inconvenience), I have given up to expect to mount and copy files to FAT32 > reliably and enjoyed the most qualified help in here (search the archives if > in doubt). I have given up on the idea to run ZFS on USB-drives, because in > bad circumstances (yanking it), the pool might be irreversibly lost as > confirmed by the authorities in here (search the archives if in doubt). I > have known how to work around not being able to print properly from Gnome > applications to A4, aside from editing and modifying the respective ppd file > in a specific, not disclosed manner, (search the archives if in doubt). I > didn't mind booting > to Failsafe after a certain percentage of power outages just to recover the > boot archive until I received a personal workaround (search the archives if > in doubt). > Again, Nevada is a moving target. Though, what did get on my optimism w.r.t. > the future of the system that I ran and encouraged others to run, was that > many of those little bugs - actually the larger part - have not been tackled > AFAIK. Yes, there was and is plenty of invention going on in OpenSolaris. But > based on a system riddled with little diseases here and there, and diseases > that inconvenience the average user, all is not well with stacking more > inventions on top of sick code. > Recently, I was informed that I should not run the system on 32 bit, and > definitively not expect reliability without mirrored drives (search the > archives if in doubt). I'm already using nvidia chipsets due to their low > power draw, without any additional cards (6150, 7050), single strips of 2 GB > (consuming less energy than 2 of 1 GB), single (green) drives. The 2 x 2 GB > that I need for OpenSolaris already form a thorn in my eyes. If now the > elitism is great enough to require me to buy 'quality hardware' (search the > archives if in doubt) and run another disk, sorry, but then I'll take out one > of the 2 GB RAM strips, abscond the idea of buying and running (and powering) > another hard drive, and preferably boot to that Efficient Eazel on the other > partition. Because it does all of those salient points further up; and more > importantly, without upgrades of RAM and disks. And when I will miss my > OpenSolaris, I can always start it in VirtualBox. > > What does this have to do with Oracle buying SUN? I still, still, have slight > hopes of Oracle stopping all the nonsense that we have seen happening in > here, and building a great Solaris 11 (whatever it will be called by then) on > a basically sane and Free code base. > > Uwe > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
