-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 a baby can still crawl over the TV remote and turn it on right when a horror movie is playing, that baby analogy didn't quite work
On 10/4/2010 14:14, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > Hi Joe, > > In case I don't make the Brown Bag, I just wanted to point out the fact > that simply developers, which includes how Linden Lab has invested > resources to sustain such world, don't share a view with users that > Virtual Reality that Virtual Reality is not just a game. This > realization is actually desired despite the politics of how we all move > from what has been said virtual is not really virtual. I won't digress > here about the subject, yet the monitor in front of us we can't touch > and see and that is not 'fake' as some people treat virtual to only > mean. I even imagine a house size 'monitor' where every wall can act as > an interactive colorful display that consists of many organized liquid > crystal units spread on like paint. That's the future... for now we have > e-paper. It's something we can't really just say is not possible > anymore, and it is something that may affect how we see content (or > broken content) in relation to policies like the TPV. > > I gather from the TPV that is it intended to help prevent broken > content, yet it has been easily attacked. I think the notion of how to > deal with broken content gets lost when developers worry more about how > to protect their liabilities. Developers simply want to say 'use at your > own risk' from a software development standpoint, yet that doesn't give > anything to help ensure content doesn't break. > > With that in mind, any word that implies 'responsibility' somehow hasn't > carried the concern about how to prevent content breakage when anybody > connects to SL Grid.I'm sure we don't want to paint our houses with a > 'use at your own risk' and expect to say it is baby-safe. What would a > baby see if an accidental bump in the wall activated something that > parents would consider an undesirable experience for baby or child. I > can only imagine the horror if the scene of the wall suddenly changed to > spook the baby as if monsters came out of the wall. Maybe this isn't > quite broken content, yet it is still an ideal situation to mention to > level where 'responsibility' is distinct from 'liabilities'. > > Just something to think about.... > > > Joe Miller wrote: >> Morgaine, >> >> Thanks for asking. My interest is to listen to specific concerns >> voiced by the majority of the community *and* (more importantly) take >> */proposed solutions/* to those concerns under advisement before the >> policy becomes effective on April 30. It won't be very productive for >> anyone if it's just a grousing session about legal theory or >> hypothetical situations that may or may not occur in the future. Yes, >> I will take all serious proposals back into the company for serious >> consideration. But, make no mistake, I'm not asking for a change set >> that makes one person happier at a time. I'm looking for the minimum >> change set that represents the broadest possible consensus among the >> community of TPV authors. >> >> So, yours are good questions, and I do intend to champion the TPV >> community's collective voice in this process. I hope we emerge with >> something actionable out of these meetings. >> >> -- Joe >> > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvAtJMACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmV8rACfWziTD7lXwmEONUMwduAzzZ+X UwIAnjdlpsmXYRWd1Lur9gHpt5CQoEDC =ozxl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
